top of page
Search

Debate - Exhibit A

  • Group F
  • Nov 9, 2016
  • 1 min read

We had to argue that we are already cyborgs. It was hard to present this view because we all believed we are not in fact cyborgs, yet. By redefining our working definition of cyborg, we were able to wrap our heads around the arguments to support this view. We defined a cyborg as not only a person who has mechanical parts (robotic parts, tech implanted) but someone who relies on technology to know what we know. (We have made tech a huge part of who we are, and we use it as an external extension of our brain.) This video helped us with re-framing our definition and to identify arguments that support this view.


 
 
 

コメント


Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Search By Tags
Follow Us
  • Facebook Black Square
  • Twitter Black Square
  • Google+ Black Square

© 2016 by Elaine Vodarek. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page